TDCB-Prüfkörper

Sprachauswahl/Language selection

This article is also available in english language TDCB-Specimen

Ein Service der
Polymer Service GmbH Merseburg
Tel.: +49 3461 30889-50 E-Mail: info@psm-merseburg.de Web: https://www.psm-merseburg.de
Unser Weiterbildungsangebot: https://www.psm-merseburg.de/weiterbildung
PSM bei Wikipedia: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymer Service Merseburg

TDCB-Prüfkörper

Die angelsächsische Abkürzung TDCB steht für "Tapered-Double-Cantilever Beam".

Prüfkörperform

In der Literatur [1–3] finden sich verschiedene Variationen der selben Grundform.

L – 200...240 mm a0 – 50...65 mm B – 10 mm Bn – 2,5 mm Nutprofil – rechteckig

Bild 1:

Schematische Darstellung des TDCB-Prüfkörpers

Ermittlung von bruchmechanischen Kennwerten an TDCB-Prüfkörpern

Bestimmungsgleichung

$K_{I}=2F({\frac {m}{B\cdot B_{n}}})^{\frac {1}{2}}$

mit der Belastung durch Zugkraft F und:

$m={\frac {1}{h}}+{\frac {3a^{2}}{h^{3}}}$

Eine umfangreiche Zusammenstellung von geeigneten Prüfkörpern für bruchmechanische Untersuchungen an Kunststoffen und Verbundwerkstoffen ist in Prüfkörper für bruchmechanische Prüfungen enthalten.

Siehe auch

• RDE-Prüfkörper

Literaturhinweise

[1]	Blumenauer, H., Pusch, G.: Technische Bruchmechanik. Deutscher Verlag für Grundstoffindustrie, Leipzig Stuttgart (1984) 1. Auflage, S. 109 und S. 146 (ISBN VLN 152-915/61/82; siehe AMK-Büchersammlung unter E 29-1)
[2]	Blumenauer, H., Pusch, G.: Technische Bruchmechanik. Deutscher Verlag für Grundstoffindustrie, Leipzig Stuttgart (1987) 2. Auflage, S. 127–129 und S. 140 (ISBN 3-342-00096-1; siehe AMK-Büchersammlung unter E 29-2)
[3]	Brown, E. N., Sottos, N. R., White, S. R.: Fracture testing of a self-healing polymer composite. Experimental Mechanics 42 (2002), No. 4, 372–379, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02412141
[4]	Kobayashi, T., Broutman, L. J.: Fracture studies in rubber-modified acrylics. I. Experimental method: Design of sandwich-tapered double-cantilever beam cleavage specimens. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 17 (1973) 1909–1917; https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1973.070170623
[5]	Yaniv, G., Daniel, I. M.: Height-tapered Double Cantilever Beam Specimen for Study of Rate Effects on Fracture Toughness of Composites. In: Whitcomb, J. D. (Eds.): Composite Material: Testing and Design (Eight Conference), ASTM STP 972. ASTM, Philadelphia (1988), S. 241–258
[6]	Hwang, J. H., Kwon, O., Lee, C. S., Hwang, W.: Interlaminar fracture and low-velocity impact of carbon/epoxy composite materials. Mechanics of Composite Materials 36 (2000) 117–130, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02681828
[7]	White, S. R., Sottos, N. R., Geubelle, P. H., Moore, J. S., Kessler, M. R., Sriram, S. R., Brown, E. N., Viswanathan, S.: Autonomic healing of polymer composites. Nature 409 (2001) 794–797, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35057232
[8]	El-Bagory, T. M., El-Fadaly, M. S., Younan, M. Y. A., Abdel-Latif, L. A.: Influence of crack orientation and crosshead speed on the fracture toughness of PVC pipe materials. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology – Transactions of the ASME 126 (2004) 489–496, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1811110

Normenhinweis

• ISO 25217 (2009-05): Adhesives − Determination of the Mode I Adhesive Fracture Energy of Structural Adhesive Joints using Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) and Tapered Double Cantilever Beam Specimens (TDCB)

Zusätzliche Literaturhinweise zur Anwendung von TDCB-Prüfkörpern:

Polymere und Polymerverbundwerkstoffe

• Daniel, I. M., Yaniv, G., Auser, J. W.: Rate effects on delamination fracture toughness of graphite/epoxy composites. In: Marshall, I. H. (Ed.) Composite Structures 4. Springer, Dordrecht (1987) S. 258–272 (ISBN 978-94-010-8048-4; E-Book: ISBN 978-94-009-3457-3); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3457-3_20

• Hwang, J. H., Lee, C. S., Hwang, W.: Effect of crack propagation directions on the interlaminar fracture toughness of carbon/epoxy composite materials. Applied Composite Materials 8 ( 2001) 411–433; https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012663722334

• Gamby, D., Delaumenie, V.: Measurement and modelling of crack propagation velocity in a viscoelastic matrix composite. Composites Part A – Applied Science and Manufacturing 28 (1997) 875–881; https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00054-7

• Li, G. Q., Meng, H., Hu, J. L.: Healable thermoset polymer composite embedded with stimuli-responsive fibres. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 9 (2012) 3279–3287; https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2012.0409

• Billiet, S., van Camp, W., Hillewaere, X. K. D., Rahier, H., Du Prez, F. E.: Development of optimized autonomous self-healing systems for epoxy materials based on maleimide chemistry. Polymer 53 (2012) 2320–2326; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2012.03.061

• Jin, H. H., Mangun, C. L., Stradley, D. S., Moore, J. S., Sottos, N. R., White, S. R.: Self-healing thermoset using encapsulated epoxy-amine healing chemistry. Polymer 53 (2012) 581–587; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2011.12.005

• Neuser, S., Michaud, V., White, S. R.: Improving solvent-based self-healing materials through shape memory alloys Polymer 53 (2012) 370–378; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2011.12.020

• Coope, T. S., Mayer, U. F. J., Wass, D. F., Trask, R. S., Bond, I. P.: Self-healing of an epoxy resin using scandium(III) triflate as a catalytic curing agent. Advanced Functional Materials 21 (2011) 4624–4631; https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201101660

• Brown, E. N.: Use of the tapered double-cantilever beam geometry for fracture toughness measurements and its application to the quantification of self-healing. The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design 46 (2011) 167–186; https://doi.org/10.1177/0309324710396018

• Li, H. Y., Wang, R. G., Liu, W. B.: Toughening self-healing epoxy resin by addition of microcapsules. Polymer & Polymer Composites 19 (2011) 223–226; https://doi.org/10.1177/0967391111019002-326

• Mangun, C. L., Mader, A. C., Sottos, N. R., White, S. R.: Self-healing of a high temperature cured epoxy using poly(dimethylsiloxane) chemistry. Polymer 51 (2010) 4063–4068; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2010.06.050

• Brown, E. N., White, S. R., Sottos, N. R.: Fatigue crack propagation in microcapsule-toughened epoxy. Journal of Materials Science 41 (2006) 6266–6273; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0512-y

• Brown, E. N.: Microcapsule induced toughening in a self-healing polymer composite. Journal of Materials Science 39 (2004) 1703–1710; https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000016173.73733.dc

• Kessler, M. R., Sottos, N. R., White, S. R.: Self-healing structural composite materials. Composites Part A – Applied Science and Manufacturing 34 (2003) 743–753; https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(03)00138-6

• Meure, S., Wu, D. Y., Furman, S.: Polyethylene-co-methacrylic acid healing agents for mendable epoxy resins. Acta Materialia 57 (2009) 4312–4320; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.032

Polymere Adhesive

• Ebewele, R., River, B., Koutsky, J.: Tapered double cantilever beam fracture tests of phenolic-wood adhesive joints. Wood and Fiber Science 11/3 (1979) 197–213; https://wfs.swst.org/index.php/wfs/article/view/925 (Zugriff am 08.06.2026)

• Ebewele, R. O., River, B. H., Koutsky, J. A.: Tapered double cantilever beam fracture tests of phenolic-wood adhesive joints: Part II. Effects of surface roughness, the nature of surface roughness, and surface aging on joint fracture energy. Wood and Fiber Science 12/1 (1980) 40–65; https://wfs.swst.org/index.php/wfs/article/view/1083 (Zugriff am 08.06.2026)

• Blackman, B. R. K., Hadavinia, H., Kinloch, A. J., Paraschi, M., Williams, J. G.: The calculation of adhesive fracture energies in mode I: revisiting the tapered double cantilever beam (TDCB) test. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 70 (2003) 233–248; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00031-0

• Meiler, M., Roche, A. A., Sautereau, H.: Tapered double cantilever beam test used as a practical adhesion test for metal/adhesive/metal systems. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 13/7 (1999) 773–788; https://doi.org/10.1163/156856199X01009

• Davalos, J. F., Madabhusi-Raman, P., Qiao, P. Z., Wolcott; M. P.: Compliance rate change of tapered double cantilever beam specimen with hybrid interface bonds. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 29 (1998) 125–139; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8442(98)00024-X

• Jin, H. H., Miller, G. M., Pety, S. J., Griffin, A. S., Stradley, D. S., Roach, D., Sottos, N. R., White, S. R.: Fracture behavior of a self-healing, toughened epoxy adhesive. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 44 (2013) 157–165; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.02.015

• Cho, J. U., Kinloch, A., Blackman, B., Sanchez, F. S. R., Han, M. S.: High-strain-rate fracture of adhesively bonded composite joints in DCB and TDCB specimens. International Journal of Automotive Technology 13 (2012) 1127–1131; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-012-0115-3

• Marzi, S., Biel, A., Stigh, U.: On experimental methods to investigate the effect of layer thickness on the fracture behavior of adhesively bonded joints. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 31 (2011) 840–850; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.08.004

• da Silva, L. F. M., Esteves, V. H. C., Chaves, F. J. P.: Fracture toughness of a structural adhesive under mixed mode loadings. Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik 42 (2011) 460–470; https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.201100808
• Karac, A., Blackman, B. R. K., Cooper, V., Kinloch, A. J., Sanchez, S. R., Teo, W. S., Ivankovic, A.: Modelling the fracture behaviour of adhesively-bonded joints as a function of test rate. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 78 (2011) 973–989; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.11.014

• Jin, H., Miller, G. M., Sottos, N. R., White, S. R.: Fracture and fatigue response of a self-healing epoxy adhesive. Polymer 52 (2011) 1628–1634; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2011.02.011

• Wong, C. K. Y., Leung, S. Y. Y., Fan, H. B., Yuen, M. M. F.: Synergistic toughening of epoxy-copper interface using a thiol-based coupling layer. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology 25 (2011) 2081–2099; https://doi.org/10.1163/016942410X544875

• Blackman, B. R. K., Kinloch, A. J., Sanchez, F. S. R., Teo, W. S., Williams, J. G.: The fracture behaviour of structural adhesives under high rates of testing. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 76 (2009) 2868–2889; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.07.013

• Suarez, J. C., Lopez, F., Miguel, S., Pinilla, P., Herreros, M. A.: Determination of the mixed-mode fracture energy of elastomeric structural adhesives: Evaluation of debonding buckling in fibre–metal hybrid laminates. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures 32 (2009) 127–140; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.2008.01317.x

• Kawashita, L. F., Kinloch, A. J., Moore, D. R., Williams, J. G.: The influence of bond line thickness and peel arm thickness on adhesive fracture toughness of rubber toughened epoxy–aluminium alloy laminates. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 28 (2008) 199–210; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.05.005

• Kawashita, L. F., Kinloch, A. J., Moore, D. R., Williams, J. G.: A critical investigation of the use of a mandrel peel method for the determination of adhesive fracture toughness of metal-polymer laminates. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 73 (2006) 2304–2323; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.04.025

• Hadavinia, H., Kawashita, L., Kinloch, A. J., Moore, D. R., Williams, J. G.: A numerical analysis of the elastic-plastic peel test. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 73 (2006) 2324–2335; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.04.022

• Kawashita, L. F., Moore, D. R., Williams, J. G.: Analysis of peel arm curvature for the determination of fracture toughness in metal-polymer laminates. Journal of Materials Science 40 (2005) 4541–4548; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-0856-8

• Kawashita, L. F., Moore, D. R., Williams, J. G.: The measurement of cohesive and interfacial toughness for bonded metal joints with epoxy adhesives. Composite Interfaces 12 (2005) 837–852; https://doi.org/10.1163/156855405774984093

• Jyoti, A., Gibson, R. F., Newaz, G. M.: Experimental studies of Mode I energy release rate in adhesively bonded width tapered composite DCB specimens. Composites Science and Technology 65 (2005) 9–18; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.04.006

• Leung, S. Y. Y., Lam, D. C. C., Luo, S. J., Wong, C. P.: The role of water in delamination in electronic packages: degradation of interfacial adhesion. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology 18 (2004) 1103–1121; https://doi.org/10.1163/1568561041581306

• Bouchet, J., Roche, A. A., Jacquelin, E.: How do residual stresses and interphase mechanical properties affect practical adhesion of epoxy diamine/metallic substrate systems? Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology 16 (2002) 1603–1623; https://doi.org/10.1163/15685610260255242

• Bouchet, J., Roche, A. A., Jacquelin, E.: The role of the polymer/metal interphase and its residual stresses in the critical strain energy release rate (G_c) determined using a three-point flexure test. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology 15 (2001) 345–369; https://doi.org/10.1163/156856101750196784

• Meiller, M., Roche, A. A., Sautereau, H.: Tapered double cantilever beam test used as a practical adhesion test for metal/adhesive/metal systems. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology 13 (1999) 773–788; https://doi.org/10.1163/156856199X01009

• Phipps, M. A., Pritchard, G., Aboutorabi, A.: The role of particle strength and filler volume fraction in the fracture of alumina-trihydrate filled epoxy-resins. Polymer & Polymer Composites 3 (1995) 71–77; https://doi.org/10.1177/096739119500300201

• Parry, T. V., Wronski, A. S.: A Technique for the measurement of adhesive fracture energy by the blister method. Journal of Adhesion 37 (1992) 251–260; https://doi.org/10.1080/00218469208033072

• Brochu, A. B. W., Evans, G. A., Reichert, W. M.: Mechanical and cytotoxicity testing of acrylic bone cement embedded with microencapsulated 2-octyl cyanoacrylate. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B – Applied Biomaterials 102 (2014) 181–189 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32994

• Martiny, P., Lani, F., Kinloch, A. J., Pardoen, T.: A maximum stress at a distance criterion for the prediction of crack propagation in adhesively-bonded joints. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 97 (2013) 105–135; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.10.025

• Marzi, S., Hesebeck, O., Brede, M., Kleiner, F.: A rate-dependent cohesive zone model for adhesively bonded joints loaded in mode I. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology 23 (2009) 881–898; https://doi.org/10.1163/156856109X411238

• Bland, D. J., Kinloch, A. J., Stolojan, V., Watts, J. F.: Failure mechanisms in adhesively bonded aluminium: an XPS and PEELS study. Surface and Interface Analysis 40 (2008) 128–131; https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.2651

• Park, S., Dillard, D. A.: Development of a simple mixed-mode fracture test and the resulting fracture energy envelope for an adhesive bond. International Journal of Fracture 148 (2007) 261–271; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-008-9200-z